Let's Talk

Living Theology inthe Metropolitan ChicagoSynod
Volume 9, Number 1
Spring 2004
The Vocation of the Laity


 

The Vocationof the Baptized and Good Works

Richard J. Niebanck

Note:  The following excerpts are from an article bythe same name in LutheranForum,Vol. 29, No.4, November 1995.  Used by permission.

Over the centuries since the Reformation, Lutherans haveproudly laid claim to the doctrine of the priesthood of all believers and thatof Christian vocation.  Luther, theydeclared, was the first Reformer to strike a blow at the medieval system ofreligion with its two classes of Christians. With justification by faith as his wrecking-ball, Luther, they assert,reduced to dust the two-story edifice of salvation-by-merit, placing allbelievers on the same level before God: equally forgiven, equally free, equallyempowered to serve their neighbors in the world...

 

The redeemed in Jesus Christ, having been called out of theworld, are at one and the same time called back into it to be its salt, leavenand light.  As Christ became incarnate inorder to be the obedient servant of all even to his death on the cross, soChristians are called to be servants of all, bearing the cross within theirbounded existence in the situations, structures, and roles where they happen tobe.  This means doing both the priestlywork of mediating Christ’s reconciling love and the non-redemptive work ofholding the world together through the offices or roles of spouse, parent,magistrate, worker, manager, as responsibly and competently as possible.  The Word is to become incarnate in dailylife, in the family, in the arena of work, in politics and the state, and inthe church.  In the economy of God,matter matters.

Lutheranism has often been alleged to have given divinesanction to a rigid social order and thereby to have acquiesced to injustice infavor of stability.  Luther, like Paul,believing that the Parousia was imminent, did nothold out much hope for fundamental social change and was actually horrified bythe excesses of the utopian sectarians. But Luther did not hold a particular social order to be divinelysanctioned.  The “orders” were God’s loving means of preserving civil justice and peace andproviding the conditions for people to live together in harmony and to insurethe free course of God’s saving Word. Luther was neither a utopian nor a theocrat: he did not espouse a rigid,much less a totalitarian, state and society. Indeed, totalitarianism as the modern world knows it would have struckLuther as demonic.  For him, the orderswere spaces for the flourishing of the Christian’s freedom in service to all.

To Luther, the role model of Christian obedience withinbounded existence through one’s office or role is the Blessed Mother of ourLord.  The Reverend Jesse Jackson, in hisaddress to the 1992 Democratic Con­vention, had it all wrong.  In that ad­dress, Jackson sought to portray Mary as an icon ofthe Pro-Choice movement, declaring that the blessed Virgin had the right tochoose an abortion but instead chose to carry the infant Jesus to term.  For him, it was Mary’s decision that was thedeterminative one.

For Christian piety and theol­ogy, and certainly for Luther,it was God’s choice, not Mary’s, that was decisive.  Mary is the model of humble obedience who brings Christ into the world through the faithfulexercise of her office, motherhood.  AsMary bore the Incarnate Word to sinners, so Christians are to incarnate God’sgracious word through their faithful exercise of their offices.

 

I offer the following personal story of what I believe to bethe proper division of labor in the exer­cise of the calling that is ours inChrist.

During the Vietnam years it fell to me, as a bureaucraticofficial in the then Lutheran Church in America, to facilitate as best I couldthe sorting out of the ethical is­sues in relation both to U.S. policy and tothe problems of conscience facing young men of draft age.  As a pastor, I turned to a study of the nor­mativesources, Scripture and the Confessions, and the writings of theologians andethicists.  For reliable descriptiveinformation I turned in large part to trusted Christian laypersons regardlessof their political preferences.

I made then the acquaintance of one of the finest Christianlaymen I have ever known.  He firstsought me out after having read something I had produced on war and Christiancon­science.  He was a career officialwith the U.S. Department of State who would shortly be sent to Saigon where he would analyze intelligenceinformation.  A Lutheran by choice, hewas a faithful member of his parish, well-read in theology, especially that ofReinhold Niebuhr.

My friend was an astute reader both of events and of humannature.  He shared Reinhold Niebuhr’s “Christian realism” and had a profound sense ofboth sin and grace.  Not a utopian, hewas nevertheless an idealist.  Hispolitical leanings were Democratic Socialist which, given his position ingovernment, he pretty much kept to himself.

Through the Vietnamyears he supplied me with a steady stream of information in the form ofpersonal impressions and official background papers on one or another aspect ofthe political and military situation. His work on North Vietnamese internal politics was fascinating.

My own passionate opposition to the war policy was temperedand nuanced by my friend’s input.  Icredit him with keeping me a Lutheran in more than name during that troublingtime.

About a year before the war’s end my friend came home and wasreassigned to the State Department unit on Anglo-American affairs.  I saw him often and continued to benefit fromhis knowledge and wise analysis.  Asbefore, he provided a corrective to my tendency to view events through anoverly simplistic, ideological lens.

During that period the Republic of Chileunderwent a bloody crisis as the leftist regime of Salvador Allendewas overthrown by Gen. Augusto Pinochet, an overthrowaccom­panied by mass killing and widespread human rights viola­tions.  Agents of Pinochet tracked down exiledofficials of the former regime and killed them. One such assassination, that of a former Allende cabinet minister, took place on Washington’s Sheridan Circle.

At about the same time, the Rev. Helmut Frenz,bishop of one of the Lutheran church bodies in Chile,had come to the U.S.on a speaking tour.  Frenz,an outspoken critic of the Pinochet government had experienced considerableharassment by the police.  It was widelyknown that he was on the regime’s hit list.

One sunny afternoon, my telephone rang at LCA head­quartersin New York.  The voice at the other end was that of myState Department friend, but without the usual relaxed, chatty tone.  “Two DINA (Chilean secret police) agentspassed customs at JFK at noon today. Tell your buddies not to let Bishop Frenz outof their sight.”

That was all.  Still inshock and disbelief, I called the in­dividual charged with arranging Frenz’ itinerary and escort and passed the word.  I learned later that the bishop had been wellshielded throughout the duration of his trip. I continue to give thanks that my friend and I had both been at our respectivestations that fateful day.

A year or so later my friend suddenly took sick anddied.  At the funeral I was privileged tospeak some words of remembrance.  Iorganized my thoughts about the three words that, for me, capture the essenceboth of the Christian’s calling in the world and of my dear friend’s life inChrist: salt, leaven, and light.

TheRev. Richard J. Niebanck, III

Delhi, NY(Retired)