Living Theology inthe Metropolitan Chicago Synod
Volume 8, Number 3
Fall 2003
Reclaiming Lament
As I See It . . .
A Role for Lamentin Public Worship
Frank C. Senn
I don’t think liturgists intentionally dropped lament frompublic worship back in the “happy days” of the 1970s. I think we were intentionally trying to recover praise andthanksgiving as core elements pervading Christian liturgy.
I understand from reports and pirated copies of worshipfolders that even in our synod there are congregations which do not followJesus’ instructions to “give thanks” when they take the bread and cup, muchless do so with anything approximating the fullness of the eucharistictradition. For their transgressions,many of these congregations have now been afflicted with endless repetitions ofpraise choruses. :)
One reason we strove hard to recover elements of praise andthanksgiving is that we were recovering typology as a primary biblicalhermeneutic. Typology is a way of thinkingin which a type of event from the past gets repeated over and over again intothe present. Thus, the exodus is a typeof action in salvation history which God uses again and again, right up to ourown deliverance from sin and death through water in Holy Baptism.
The use of typology assumes that there is some meaning andpurpose to history. People may have found themselves in conditions as harsh asthe life of the Hebrew slaves in Egypt. But using such imagery assumes hope in a coming redemption.
Within the pattern of grace, recollection of times of wantis subsumed under recollection of times of satiety. Typology is the bedrock ofanamnesis or remembrance, memory of God’s saving acts is the reason for givingthanks, and the pattern of grace seen in typology elicits the praise of God.
Yet there is in our time, as there has been in all times, aneed for communal lament. Colorfulballoons, presiders with smiley faces, and cheerful ditties led by the praiseband cannot obliterate our actual knowledge of human sin, our experience ofdeath, and our fear of evil. We need tohave ways of publicly and corporately lamenting human culpability, holocaustsand genocides, human oppression, systemic injustices, and tragic events thatoccur with no apparent meaning or purpose. And we cannot do justice to lament as something of spiritual value inand of itself if it is only read within a story with a joyful ending.
That’s a problem if we’re talking about genuine lament.
To some extent this may be unavoidable.
We can recover the use of the Great Litany.
V/ O Lord, do not deal with us according to oursins,
R/ Nor reward us according to our iniquities.
O God, merciful Father,
you despise neither the sighing of a contrite heart
nor the desires of the sorrowful.
Mercifully assist us in our prayers
which we make before you in all our troubles
Graciously hear us,
and bring to naught those evils
which the craft and subtilty of man or the devil
so that we your servants, unhurt by terror,
may always give thanks to you in your holy Church;
through Jesus Christ, your Son, our Lord.
Or this one:
V/ O Lord, do not enter into judgment with yourservant.
R/ For in your sight shall no one living bejustified.
Almighty God,
you know that we are set in the midst
of many and great dangers.
You know that because of our fallen human state
we cannot always stand upright.
Grant us such strength and protection
thatmay support us in all dangers,
and carry us through all times of trial and temptation;
throughJesus Christ, your Son, our Lord. Amen.
Frank C. Senn
Pastor, Immanuel, Evanston