Living Theology
in the Metropolitan Chicago Synod
Evangelical Lutheran Church In America
Volume 6, Number 3
Christmas 2001
The Purpose-DrivenÔ Church: Growth Without Compromising Your Message & Mission by Rick Warren, Zondervan
Publishing House, 1995.
Reviewed
by Wayne R. Cowell
Every Sunday the traffic streams up
the four-lane half-mile entrance to the seventy-four acre campus of Saddleback
Community Church in Orange County, California. Ten thousand people will attend
“seeker” services at this fastest growing Baptist church in American history.
The crowd was much smaller in 1980 when author Rick Warren started Saddleback
in a high school theatre. Two hundred and five people showed up at Easter,
attracted by a letter that started, “At last! A new church for those who’ve
given up on traditional church services.”
With a strong sense of call to discover “…the principles – biblical,
cultural, and leadership principles – that produce healthy, growing churches,”
the author waited twenty years to write this book while the concepts
percolated, developed, and matured. He is now ready to say that
“The principles in this book have been tested over
and over, not only at Saddleback Church, but in many other purpose-driven
churches of all sizes, shapes, locations, and denominations. While most of the
illustrations are from Saddleback, that is only because I am most familiar with
our church. It seems that every day I get a letter from another church that has
adopted the purpose-driven church paradigm and has been able to ride waves of
growth that God has sent their way.” (p. 19)
The biblical principles that serve as fundamental sources
for the attitudes and actions described in this book are found in the Great
Commandment (Matthew 22:37-40) and the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19-20). The
cultural and leadership “principles” in the book are actually, I believe,
marketing and management techniques, which is not to deny their effectiveness
or their service to the biblical principles.
“Every church[1]
is driven by something,” says Warren, “There is a guiding force, a controlling
assumption, a directing conviction behind everything that happens.” The guiding
force may be tradition, personality, finances, programs, buildings, events,
seekers – or purpose. This book is about how to define and articulate a
biblically based purpose for a church, and then how to make the church’s stated
purpose drive everything it does. The people of the church begin their
discovery of purpose with Bible study aimed at answering four questions (p.
98):
1. Why does the church
exist?
2. What are we to be as a church? (Who and what are we?)
3. What are we to do as a church? (What does God want done
in the world?)
4. How are we to do it?
At first Warren seems to be allowing considerable leeway in
answering these questions, as long as the resulting statement of purpose is
biblical, specific, transferable (i.e., short enough to be remembered and
passed on by everyone in the church), and measurable (you must be able to tell
whether your church is doing it or not). In fact he is more focused. He holds
up as normative for the church the performance of five tasks, which he derives
from the Great Commandment/Great Commission texts. Saddleback’s purpose
statement captures these tasks:
“To bring people to Jesus and membership in his family, develop them to Christlike maturity, and equip them for their ministry in the church and life mission in the world, in order to magnify God’s name.” (p. 107)
The italicized key words
point to the five tasks given to the church, tasks that provide the reason for
the church to exist:
1. Love the Lord with
all your heart
The church exists to worship God. (Magnify)
2. Love your neighbor
as yourself
The church exists to minister to people. (Ministry)
3. Go and make
disciples
The church exists to communicate God’s Word. (Mission)
4. Baptizing them
The church exists to provide fellowship for believers. (Membership)
5. Teaching them to
obey
The church exists to edify, or educate, God’s people. (Maturity)
As reductive as this is it shows Rick Warren’s ability to reach
out to a generation whose tastes have been shaped by marketing and whose
attention span had been conditioned by television. His research has given him a
picture of the people of the Saddleback Valley – he calls them “Saddleback Sam
and his wife Samantha.” Saddleback Community Church is driven by its purpose to
bring Sam and Samantha into its fellowship, first into the “crowd” of believers
and nonbelievers who attend the seeker services, and then into greater and
greater levels of commitment. When Sam and Samantha “accept Christ” and become
members of the congregation they are baptized as a sign of this fellowship[2].
At this point Sam and Samantha may attend the Wednesday night member services.
The Sunday seeker services are different because Rick Warren believes that
unbelievers cannot truly worship. However, “genuine worship is a powerful
witness to unbelievers if it is done in a style that makes sense to them.” (p.
132) Saddleback provides classes for Samantha and Sam to attend, has
well-defined expectations, and offers work to do as they mature. They may
eventually reach the inner core of lay ministers, of whom there are about 1,500
at Saddleback. Preaching, music, indeed the whole tenor of life at Saddleback
Community Church derives from and feeds into this program of growth and
maturation, guided and measured by the statement of purpose.
The members, in particular
the lay ministers, are very intentional in their invitational strategy. Of
course the community will grow! Until
they run out of people whose need for a worshiping, working faith community is
being met at Saddleback they will grow exponentially – the compound interest
law is at work. And I do not doubt that the Holy Spirit is present in the
community. One reads about this and wonders whether mainline churches have lost
the will to address the lifelong task of forming Christians.
But does Rick Warren provide
a model for Lutherans? To answer, let’s start from common ground. The
Saddleback purpose-formers would agree with the sixteenth century reformers
that “…it is God’s will to call men to eternal salvation, to draw them to
himself, convert them, beget them anew, and sanctify them through this means
and in no other way—namely, through his holy Word (when one hears it preached
or reads it)…” but the reformers added “and
the sacraments (when they are used according to his Word)”.[3]
(Emphasis added) Let’s imagine a Lutheran congregation that wishes to write a
purpose statement that will guide the members in their evangelism and their
Christian education efforts. If they ask Warren’s four questions and give
answers true to their heritage they will speak about what the church is and
does in terms of word and sacrament. A wonderful reference for such a
congregation is the ELCA statement The
Use of the Means of Grace: A Statement on the Practice of Word and Sacrament.[4]
For example, from that statement:
“In a world of yearning, brokenness, and sin, the
Church’s clarity about the Gospel of Jesus Christ is vital. God has promised to
come to all through the means of grace: the Word and the sacraments of Christ’s
institution. While the Church defines for itself customary practices that
reflect care and fidelity, it is these means of grace that define the Church.”[5]
Another outstanding reference is The Witness of the Worshipping Community: Liturgy and the Practice of
Evangelism[6]
by Frank C. Senn. The congregation writing a purpose statement would find:
“God’s mission is to reconcile the world to himself.
God has pursued this mission by calling and forming a people who shall be God’s
people. The means of calling, gathering, enlightening, and sanctifying God’s
people has been through the proclamation of the word and the celebration of the
sacraments.” … “The proclamation of the word and the administration of the
sacraments are the means by which God accomplishes his mission, because Christ
is present in the word and sacraments and the Spirit works faith in those who
hear and receive. Worship is not only what the people do, it is also what God
does through the proclamation of the word and the administration of the
sacraments.”[7]
This is not the same
understanding of God’s people that is presented by Warren. The Saddleback
Community is bound together as a people to whom Christ is present through their
individual conversion experiences. The principal focus of their church life,
their proclamation and their worship, is the encouragement of “decisions for
Christ” by unbelievers. Baptism and Communion are “symbols of salvation.” (See the outline for the course in
“Discovering Saddleback Membership” on p. 318.) It is fair to say that the people of Saddleback regard the
sacraments as signs of grace but not as means of grace. They lack the fullness
of the God-given means of grace in their ecclesial life.
At Saddleback the Bible is
“God’s inerrant guidebook for life.” (See the outline for the course “Life
Perspectives I” on p. 354.) Warren has a talent for interpretive reading of
Scripture under the rubric of guidance for practical church life and much of
this could be helpful to pastors and lay leaders. However, he gives short
shrift to the ordination of people with special oversight for the preservation
of the apostolic witness through history: “There are no laypeople in a biblical
church; there are only ministers. The idea of two classes of Christians, clergy
and laity, is the creation of Roman Catholic tradition.”[8]
(p. 391)
Woven into the fabric of The Purpose-DrivenÔ Church is a view of salvation and holiness that is in tension with a Lutheran
appropriation of the Great Tradition of the church. Tempting as it is to be
impressed with the successful growth of a megachurch I cannot recommend to
Lutherans that this book be used uncritically as a plan of action for
congregational growth.
However, there is more to be
said. The 2001 Churchwide Assembly of the ELCA adopted a new evangelism
strategy (by a vote of 965 to 9), which provides guidance to Lutherans to
“clarify their sense of purpose and mission, seek new ways to be open to
innovation and change, and share new or existing evangelism plans with the
whole church prior to the 2003 Churchwide Assembly.”[9]
This is the right time for Lutherans to ask Rick Warren’s four questions.
This may, in fact, be the
right time for Lutherans and Evangelical Protestants to take counsel together.
Examining that idea is well beyond the scope of this book review but I will
suggest a model. A distinguished group of Evangelical Protestants and Roman
Catholics began a consultation in September, 1992, which resulted in the publication
in 1994 of the statement “Evangelicals & Catholics Together: The Christian
Mission in the Third Millennium.”[10]
The statement does not speak officially for the two communities but it speaks
responsibly from and to them. The consultation was a journey of discovery about
unity and differences, about what the participants believed their communities
could affirm and hope for together, what they searched for together, what they
contended against together, and how they might witness together, knowing that the
church “lives by and for the Great Commission.” They acknowledged their differences and the “need to challenge
one another, always speaking the truth in love building up the Body.” Lutherans
would do well to study this statement as they ponder a strategy for evangelism.
Both Warren (p. 106) and
Senn[11]
hold up the model of the Jerusalem community of God’s new people who “devoted
themselves to the apostles’ teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread
and the prayers” (Acts 2:42). Exploring that text together would be a good way
to start a consultation.
Wayne R. Cowell
[1] The author’s use of the word
“church” usually refers to a local church and could be read “congregation.” It
is clear in context when he is speaking of the universal church.
[2] It is not clear how many of
the “unbelievers” and “unchurched” who convert at Saddleback are lapsed
Christians. Rebaptism is common Evangelical Protestant practice.
[3] See Solid Declaration, Article II, Tappert Edition 530.49-530.50.
[4] Adopted for guidance and
practice by the Fifth Biennial Churchwide Assembly of the Evangelical Lutheran
Church in America, August 19, 1997.
[5] The Use of the Means of Grace, p. 7.
[6] Paulist Press, 1993. See the
review by Philip H. Pfatteicher in Lutheran
Forum, Vol. 31, No. 3 (Fall, 1997), p. 58.
[7] Frank C. Senn, The Witness of the Worshiping Community,
p. 61 and p. 62.
[8] We Lutherans could join our
Roman Catholic, Orthodox, and Anglican sisters and brothers in saying that
bishops have a special teaching responsibility for the preservation of the
faith. See Frank Senn’s column “As I See It…” in this issue.
[9] ELCA News Service, 12 August
2001.
[10] First Things 43 (May 1994), pp. 15-22.
[11] Senn, ibid. p. 61.